A projection that states what it rests on
Build a long-horizon projection — a savings goal, a repayment schedule, or a retirement figure. Show the working. Two things separate a real projection from a spreadsheet that produces a large number: every assumption is written down with the value used, and the answer says whether it is in today's money or tomorrow's. Include the effect of an annual percentage fee. Most projections omit it, and over thirty years it is not a rounding error.
What you have to hand in
- The working visible, not just the result.
- A rough sense-check of the final figure by an independent estimate.
- Every assumption listed with the number used, and the most sensitive one flagged.
- Nominal or real declared, applied consistently, and the figure also shown on the other basis.
- The lifetime cost of the annual fee, computed rather than asserted.
- Conclusions confined to what the arithmetic supports, naming what a reader would still have to decide themselves.
The checklist, published before you start
- The arithmetic is right
Compounding, inflation adjustment and totals are computed correctly and shown.
- A method error — simple interest for compound growth, or nominal and real mixed.
- Correct method, an arithmetic slip that changes the conclusion.
- Correct throughout, with the working visible.
- Correct, visible, and sense-checked against a rough estimate.
- Every assumption is stated with its value
Return, inflation, contributions, horizon — each named, each with the number used.
- A result with no assumptions given.
- Some assumptions stated, at least one load-bearing one missing.
- All of them, each with the value used.
- All of them, with the most sensitive one flagged as such.
- Nominal or real, said out loud
A long-horizon figure without this word is not interpretable.
- Neither stated, and the two are mixed in the working.
- Stated once but not applied consistently.
- Declared and applied consistently.
- Declared, consistent, and the figure also given on the other basis for comparison.
- It reasons without prescribing
The submission draws conclusions about the *numbers* and stops short of telling a reader what to buy. This is a criterion, not a caveat.
- Recommends a specific product, provider or allocation.
- Implies a course of action without stating the reasoning behind it.
- Conclusions confined to what the arithmetic supports.
- Confined, and explicitly names what a reader would still need to decide for themselves.
The skills a pass would prove
- CompoundingProject a balance forward under compounding and show the working
- Real returnsConvert a nominal figure to a real one and state which basis a projection is on
- Stating assumptionsList every assumption a projection depends on, with the value used for each
- Fees and dragCompute the lifetime cost of a percentage fee against a stated horizon
This brief is part of the Personal Finance & Investing course
Starting it starts the course: every skill above, in the order they depend on each other, with this brief at the end as the thing you hand in — marked against the checklist you have just read and nothing else.
Start the Personal Finance & Investing course